Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Hostpital Doctor Awards 2007

Andy Hartland (with material supplied by Bharat Patel) put in Walsall's work on IMPACT campaigns for the Hospital Doctor awards under the 'One Vision' category, which is about collaborative working between Primary & Secondary Care.

Much to my pleasure we've been short-listed and are therefore invited to an event for the finalists on 22/11/07 at the Hilton Hotel in London.

It looks as though the worst we can get is third prize in our category.

Well done to all and fingers crossed.

Monday, March 20, 2006

IMPACT - USA

As drug bill soars, doctors get an 'unsales' pitch in Pennsylvania

Tuesday, March 14, 2006

By Scott Hensley, The Wall Street Journal

PHILADELPHIA -- Like salespeople for pharmaceutical companies, Kristen Nocco shows up in doctors' offices with slick brochures, well-rehearsed talking points and the budget to buy lunch.
But Ms. Nocco's goal is the opposite of the company people: She wants doctors to consider alternatives to expensive brand-name drugs.

Ms. Nocco, who used to be an Eli Lilly & Co. saleswoman, is part of an "unsales" team funded by the state of Pennsylvania. Its message is honed by Harvard University professors who say they're trying to help doctors make decisions grounded in scientific evidence instead of company marketing. Many of the approaches Ms. Nocco advocates -- such as cheap generic drugs and lifestyle changes -- would cost less, too. Some of her talking points take on top-selling drugs such as AstraZeneca PLC's Nexium for heartburn and Pfizer Inc.'s Celebrex for arthritis pain.

The effort comes as states and employers are reeling from ever-higher bills for prescription drugs. Pennsylvania alone spends about $3 billion a year on drugs for state employees, poor people on Medicaid and elderly people eligible for a generous drug-assistance program.
Pharmaceutical companies go to great effort to ensure that doctors think of brand-name products when they pull out their prescription pads. While the most visible part of that effort is a barrage of television ads, companies spend more money addressing doctors directly. Makers of brand-name drugs employ more than 90,000 salespeople in the U.S. at a cost of more than $12 billion a year, according to Amundsen Group, an industry consulting firm.

These "detailers," so called because they can recite drug facts from memory, crowd into doctors' offices, handing out pens and notepads emblazoned with brand logos and hoping to corner the doctors for a minute or two to deliver a sales pitch. Companies track doctors' habits by purchasing data collected when pharmacies fill prescriptions. A company knows which doctors are friendliest toward its drugs -- and which salespeople are the most effective.
Now a wave of generic alternatives to some of the nation's best-selling drugs is sweeping into pharmacies as old patents expire. Generic copies of Merck & Co.'s blockbuster cholesterol drug Zocor will go on sale in June and could be prescribed in place of Pfizer's branded drug, Lipitor, the industry's No. 1 seller with 2005 U.S. sales of $7.4 billion. But generic companies don't have huge sales forces behind their products.

That's one reason some organizations are fielding their own representatives to make sure the new generics and other alternatives to brand-name drugs are getting used. At Kaiser Permanente, the big California health-maintenance organization, one part of a broad doctor-education program looks for doctors who seem to be overprescribing or underprescribing certain pills. Kaiser then sends pharmacists or senior doctors to advise these outliers.
Medco Health Solutions Inc., which manages drug benefits for large employers, sends pharmacists to encourage doctors to use generics. Governments in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom also seek to educate doctors in their own offices.

Ken Johnson, a spokesman for the drug trade group PhRMA, said in a statement that the industry encourages doctors to study a variety of information. But he said "it would be a big mistake to discount or ignore information provided by sales representatives who work for the companies that spend 10 to 15 years developing each new drug." Companies "have the most information about new treatments," he said.

At Harvard, Jerry Avorn, a professor of medicine, has been a pioneer in what is called "academic detailing." He says the goal is to use industry sales techniques -- such as boiling down material to a few bullet points -- to deliver a message based on evidence about what works best.
Thomas Snedden, who runs the Pennsylvania Department of Aging's drug-assistance program, called on Dr. Avorn when he wanted to counterbalance brand-name marketing. The department, via a contractor, agreed to pay a foundation led by Dr. Avorn $3 million over three years to put an "unsales" force in the field.

Pennsylvania has long tried to influence prescribing by doctors in the state. In the early 1990s, Mr. Snedden's department took advantage of computerized ordering systems at pharmacies to block state payments for Halcion, a sleeping pill then linked to violent agitation especially in the elderly. Worried that doctors were ignoring heightened warnings, the state started rejecting prescription claims for Halcion. Prescriptions dropped 95 percent in a month, Mr. Snedden says.
Mr. Snedden acknowledges that overriding prescriptions at the pharmacy isn't popular with doctors or patients. "We're trying to go directly to the physicians, instead of the pharmacists, and have a dialogue with them about prescribing practices that we think should be corrected," he says.

That's where Ms. Nocco, a 37-year-old pharmacist, and her seven colleagues come in. Their goal is to get busy doctors to set aside time to hear a presentation. Since September, the Pennsylvania unsales representatives have made contact with doctors about 1,500 times and conducted more than 400 educational meetings.

One morning, Ms. Nocco walked into a doctor's office in the Olney neighborhood of North Philadelphia. Like drug companies, Dr. Avorn's organization had done its research and knew the doctor was a heavy prescriber of drugs to the elderly. Ms. Nocco found a waiting room packed with patients. Two drug-company representatives stood between her and the receptionist's desk. She turned on her heels and hustled back to the parking lot, figuring she might have better luck at the next office on her list.

"Having failed so many times, it doesn't bother me anymore," she said. She was in a hurry to squeeze in one more appointment before a lunch meeting nearby that took weeks to set up.
In the beige Mazda minivan that doubles as family taxi and mobile office, Ms. Nocco pulled out a sheaf of maps and driving directions she had printed from the Internet. She lives in Philadelphia's Center City with her husband and two children and is still learning her way to the 75 doctors in her territory.

Twenty minutes later, she arrived at the next stop and lucked out. The doctor overheard her explaining the program to his receptionist, put aside a patient's file and invited Ms. Nocco inside for a two-minute chat. He asked her to call later to schedule a longer appointment.
Though Ms. Nocco believes she carries a more enlightened message than her corporate counterparts, she faces the same barriers to getting in the door. "Until you prove yourself, they're going to treat you like a drug rep because you are," she says. "You're asking for the same thing: their time."

Unlike company representatives, she doesn't have any coffee mugs, clipboards or other logo-festooned items to give to doctors or their staff. To break the ice, she uses her one advantage: her link to Harvard and Dr. Avorn. She carries a letter of introduction from the professor and tells doctors they can have a free copy of his book on the drug industry if they listen to her spiel. Or they can choose from two general-interest medical books by Harvard doctors.

Also, Harvard has certified the content of her talks and brochures as educational. Doctors who listen to the material and pass a short quiz receive continuing-medical-education credits, which many of them need to maintain their professional certification.

Dr. Avorn is confident his team can get traction despite being outnumbered. "Doctors know when they're being sold a bill of goods, and they know when they're getting the straight scoop with no hidden agenda," he says. "They crave the latter, and they know they hardly ever get it."
Mr. Johnson of the drug-industry trade group said company representatives are well-trained to answer doctors' questions about proper use of drugs and noted that they must comply with strict federal regulations on what they can say.

Ms. Nocco aims to sit down four times a year for 15 minutes or longer with the doctors she has been assigned. All told, the unsales representatives are targeting about 1,000 doctors of the 26,000 across the state. For now, they are being judged by how many meetings they get with doctors. Mr. Snedden says it's too soon to detect any impact of the unsales program in Pennsylvania, but "ultimately, we need to see a change in the prescribing patterns."

Just before noon, Ms. Nocco arrived at the office of a group of geriatricians on the campus of Jeanes Hospital in the leafy Fox Chase district. In the lunchroom under a purple wall clock bearing the logo of AstraZeneca's Nexium, the heartburn pill, she unwrapped a tray of Italian hoagies delivered by a shop she discovered in South Philadelphia when she worked for Eli Lilly.
She left the drug maker in 1998 to go into advertising, specializing in prescription drugs at a small agency in Philadelphia. After leaving the agency because of family responsibilities, she worked on another academic detailing project that led to her current job in the Pennsylvania program.

Over lunch, she told three doctors about the program and joked, "I'm redeeming myself now" after years working for the drug industry.

Her subject was managing pain without Merck's Vioxx and Pfizer's Bextra, two drugs that were withdrawn from the market over safety worries. Pfizer still sells a similar drug, Celebrex, which costs about $80 for a month's supply. Ms. Nocco suggested over-the-counter alternatives such as naproxen or acetaminophen, which is best known by the brand name Tylenol. The drugs cost less than $9 a month, she said. If they don't work, she suggested prescription alternatives, including some generics. She went on to discuss a variety of options for severe pain.

After almost an hour, Martin Leicht got up to leave. "This was much more fun than a drug-rep lunch," Dr. Leicht said. "They won't come in and say, 'Use Tylenol first.' "

Recently Ms. Nocco and her colleagues have been targeting overuse of costly heartburn pills called proton-pump inhibitors. These drugs, which include Nexium, can cost more than $100 a month. Patients need to take them every day.

The unsales representatives say many people can find relief by watching what they eat or taking inexpensive over-the-counter medicines such as antacids and Zantac. If neither of those remedies works, patients can try a proton-pump inhibitor -- perhaps starting with Prilosec, a chemical cousin of Nexium that is available more cheaply over the counter. Prilosec or Nexium may only be needed for a few weeks before patients are weaned off, according to the unsales pitch.

Cynthia Callaghan, a spokeswoman for AstraZeneca, says in an email that the older drugs may be appropriate for some people but she says clinical-trial data show Nexium offers superior relief. Sales of Nexium, AstraZeneca's biggest product, increased 18 percent to $4.63 billion last year.

Nexium alone accounted for more than $15.2 million, or 2.8 percent, of total drug spending by Pennsylvania's elderly assistance program last year, or 15 times the annual budget for the unsales representatives. William Trombetta, professor of pharmaceutical marketing at St. Joseph's University in Philadelphia, says: "Given the price of Nexium, it would not take much in terms of switches to more than cover the state's detailing cost and then some."

Tuesday, February 14, 2006

ALLHAT educational outreach programme

Researchers in the largest high blood pressure clinical trial ever conducted are launching a comprehensive outreach program to improve high blood pressure control nationwide.

About 150 physicians in 34 states and Washington, DC, have completed training to educate other physicians in their communities. Their goal: to help doctors and patients prevent and better treat high blood pressure.

The new $3.7 million, three-year educational effort is a follow-up to the landmark Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) and is being implemented in collaboration with the National High Blood Pressure Education Program (NHBPEP). Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), part of the National Institutes of Health, the ALLHAT blood pressure study compared the effects of four major classes of medications to treat high blood pressure. More than 42,000 patients ages 55 and older participated.

The main results were published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in December 2002 and played a central role in NHBPEP's revision of the clinical practice guidelines on high blood pressure released in May 2003 (Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure).

More here

Monday, January 02, 2006

External threats to EBM

The article, "External Threats to Evidence-Based Practice," has appeared in the latest issue of the Rhode Island American College of Physicians (ACP) chapter newsletter. It's well worth a read and is on the web here.

In the article, the author, Dr Roy M Poses, reviews the evidence-based practice process, summarized in four steps, and then threats that can occur at each step.

Happy New Year

Thursday, December 01, 2005

Clopidogrel - The ACTIVE study

Oral anticoagulants still treatment of choice in atrial fibrillation

American Heart Association Scientific Sessions late-breaking news:

DALLAS, Nov. 14 – A trial testing treatment for irregular heartbeat ended early due to a 47 percent excess risk of stroke, heart attack and other vascular events in patients receiving the test therapy researchers reported at a late-breaking clinical trials session at the American Heart Association’s Scientific Sessions 2005.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects about one percent of the population and is associated with an increased risk of vascular events, particularly stroke, due to blood clots that form in the heart’s left atrial appendage (LAA).

To prevent stroke, doctors give AF patients anticoagulants, such as warfarin, said Stuart J. Connolly, M.D., F.R.C.P.C., director of the division of cardiology at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada. He is lead author of the late-breaking clinical report on the Atrial Fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for Prevention of Vascular Events (ACTIVE).

According to Dr. Connolly, “ACTIVE-W was halted in September 2005 after the study’s Data & Safety Monitoring Board alerted the Steering Committee to the difference in efficacy clearly in favor of anticoagulation compared with clopidogrel plus aspirin,” he said.

Today’s late-breaking clinical trial report marked the first revelation of the data behind that decision.

He stressed that the other two arms of the same trial – ACTIVE-A and ACTIVE-I – are on-going. ACTIVE A is for patients unable to tolerate standard therapy with warfarin. ACTIVE I is examining the effect of blood pressure lowering in atrial fibrillation.

“Oral anticoagulation has been particularly successful for stroke prevention in AF,” Connolly said. “But warfarin is associated with many problems.”

Many patients are unable to tolerate warfarin because it can cause bleeding. Patients must be monitored monthly. The only alternative is aspirin, which provides only modest protection, Connolly added.

Clopidogrel plus aspirin is a standard treatment for other conditions, notably acute coronary syndrome and heart attack, which are characterized by arterial clots. It is also used during angioplasty procedures, in which a balloon-tipped catheter is threaded into the heart’s arteries and inflated to open narrowed vessels. AF would have been a new use for the treatment, Connolly explained, because the clots have a different pathophysiology.

ACTIVE-W included more than 6,500 patients with AF, and at least one additional stroke risk factor. Patients were randomly assigned either to anti-platelet therapy (clopidogrel plus aspirin) or to oral anticoagulation (usually with warfarin). For the primary endpoint of stroke, heart attack, embolism and vascular death, the test group had an annual risk of 5.6 percent compared to 3.9 percent for the warfarin group, an excess risk of 1.7 percent (47 percent relative increase), he said.

The researchers also reported no reduction in bleeding in the clopidogrel plus aspirin group compared to anticoagulation, Connolly added. “We expected less bleeding with clopidogrel plus aspirin, but the risk of major bleeds was not significantly different from warfarin. However, there was an important subgroup difference,” he said.

“During the study, we became concerned that we had enrolled a very high rate of patients who were already on warfarin,” he said. More than three-fourths of patients were already experienced with oral anticoagulation.

“We found that there were important differences in the treatment effects between the patients who had been on warfarin at baseline and those who were not, especially related to bleeding risk,” Connolly said.

Patients randomized to clopidogrel plus aspirin at the start of the study had a 36 percent excess risk of major bleeding if they had previously been on warfarin.

In contrast, for patients who had no prior warfarin use, the relative risk of having a major bleed was reduced by nearly the same amount (37 percent) when they received clopidogrel plus ASA.

“Anticoagulants such as warfarin are superior to clopidogrel plus aspirin for prevention of vascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation,” he said.

“Our study does not adequately address the question of whether this is true in patients without previous exposure to warfarin, but there is some evidence that the situation may be different in those patients,” he said, adding that ACTIVE A will shed light on that issue.

Co-authors are: the ACTIVE investigators.
Funding was provided by the Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Statements and conclusions of study authors that are published in the American Heart Association scientific journals are solely those of the study authors and do not necessarily reflect association policy or position. The American Heart Association makes no representation or warranty as to their accuracy or reliability.

Thursday, November 17, 2005

Statins - The IDEAL study

For the past year in the US, the cholesterol mantra has been to push the LDL cholesterol below 70 ( = 3.5 in our money) for patients who are known to have diseased coronary arteries. The recommendations were somewhat controversial - having been made by a panel of doctors who had ties to the statin industry - but they were widely adopted.

The IDEAL study does seem to call the mantra into question.

Even though the high dose Lipitor did lower the LDL more than the Zocor, the final results were about the same: There were 178 coronary deaths (4.0%) in the simvastatin group vs 175 (3.9%) in the atorvastatin group.

Nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 321 patients (7.2%) in the simvastatin group and in 267 (6.0%) in the atorvastatin group.

Interestingly, people were less tolerant of Lipitor. They were more likely to experience muscle aches and liver enzyme elevations. And they were more likely to stop taking it.

Overall adherence, defined as total study medication exposure as a percentage of total follow-up time, was 89% in the atorvastatin group and 95% in the simvastatin group. By the end of the study, 14% of the atorvastatin-allocated and 7% of the simvastatin-allocated patients had permanently discontinued study medication.

Read the study here:

http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/294/19/2437

Tuesday, November 08, 2005

STEPS - A MeReC must read

Find it here:
http://www.npc.co.uk/MeReC_Briefings/2004/briefing_no_30.pdf